Bienvenue sur mon portail de connaissances. Je suis un mystique indépendant et un enquêteur de toutes choses mystérieuses, sans aucune loyauté envers une philosophie ou une religion particulière autre que la règle d'or et le principe « Connais-toi toi-même ».
Depuis plus de cinquante ans, j'ai étudié les mystères de l'univers et de la conscience, avec des études universitaires en psychologie, philosophie et cosmologie aboutissant à un diplôme en arts libéraux. J'ai poursuivi mes études privées en hermétisme, en kabbale, en traditions mystiques orientales et occidentales et en divination.
Je suis convaincu que la maîtrise de la vie commence par la poursuite des questions sur la conscience et par la découverte de la manière d'établir des liens plus profonds avec le mystère qui sous-tend toute existence. Des expériences particulières de mon enfance m’ont poussé à explorer de telles choses. À plusieurs reprises, j'ai joué avec un dé et j'ai découvert que je pouvais lancer les six plusieurs fois de suite, environ 18 à 26 fois, ce qui est impossible par pur hasard. J'ai vécu la mort d'inconnus en temps réel pendant mon sommeil, voyant parfois l'incident rapporté aux informations le lendemain. J'obtiendrais un score élevé au test Kreskin ESP, une fois obtenu 23 réponses correctes sur 25. Comment tout cela est-il possible ?
Il faudrait sûrement que la conscience soit un phénomène non local pour lequel le cerveau n'est qu'un transducteur lui permettant de vivre une expérience discrète. Cette théorie des transducteurs est la meilleure façon d’expliquer les perroquets. L'intelligence de ces créatures est phénoménale malgré la taille minuscule de leur cerveau. Leur « transducteur » semble avoir une efficacité bien supérieure à la nôtre. Si leur cerveau avait la taille du nôtre, les perroquets seraient nos suzerains – ce qui n’est pas ma pensée la plus réconfortante.
La question la plus profonde est la suivante : si la conscience n’est pas locale, cela signifierait-il que sa portée est infinie, englobant l’univers entier ? Les mystiques d’autrefois ont toujours soutenu que c’était le cas. Quel potentiel réside alors dans notre esprit ? Le vieil adage « Connais-toi toi-même » est peut-être un conseil bien plus puissant que nous ne l’imaginons. Je suis dûment dévoué à cette enquête et j'espère partager mes découvertes avec des chercheurs partageant les mêmes idées.
Pour être alerté des nouveaux articles et des sorties de livres, inscrivez-vous ici . Je ne partage ni ne vends d'informations personnelles et considère le spam comme un crime. Profitez des images de fond d'écran gratuites ci-dessous, conçues par PD Fougères de Trigram Books.
From the Author
CHECK OUT WHAT READERS HAD TO SAY ABOUT FORBIDDEN DISCLOSURE
Reader Feedback
The way I receive information from the Field is not verbal: I have to translate information dumps into relatable words and concepts. I get where you are coming from though. I had the same reaction when I read The Ra Contact: Teaching the Law of One, by Don Elkins, Carla L. Rueckert, et al. I cringed every time Channeler, Carla Rueckert used phrases like, “That which you would call the moon,” or “in 50 of your earth years,” as if she were talking with an alien entity. For me, this was a dead giveaway that what she was doing had nothing to do with spiritual revelation.
My experience with gnosis is not like talking with an entity, per se, but is more like trying to recall a dream before memory of it fades away. Another analogy would be like if you listened to a voice behind a wall and were asked to draw an image of the one who spoke. If the voice seemed more masculine, you would begin by drawing a male, but this in no way indicates that the voice actually belonged to a man. You simply put together your best representation of your non-verbal, non-physical experience. In Rueckert's case, she appeared to be translating what should already have been translated had she been having a genuine spiritual revelation. If an impression of the moon came in by gnosis, one would not need to translate again saying, "What you would call the moon." One would simply have an impression of the moon and say so.
”I just found it too hard to believe that yourself, a clairvoyant, could hold such a non ending conversation with a supposed entity... I just can’t buy this entity talking in such a human manner and grammar.”
I do agree that many abductees repeat basically the same rhetoric– with some exceptions like Karla Turner– but it is because they are programmed to do so. One major inconsistency is their “prophecies” over time. In the 60’s, during the Cold War, they were shown images of the earth blowing up. Now they are shown whatever extinction level event is currently dramatized in the media, be it environmental or nuclear. Our accusers manipulate abductees through the current fears of the day.
Bear in mind also that abductees hear words in their heads when they “channel” their contacts; whereas, I get non-verbal information from the higher realm which is difficult to interpret and translate. It is interesting that you find abductees more credible, given that they are under the influence of those whose intentions are in question. Is that not a conflict of interest on their part?
“You may be the only clairvoyant sharing this sort of knowledge and warning. But on the other hand, many abductees have expressed their knowledge on a very consistent basis.”
I’m not sure what “human things” you are addressing. I referred to changing the way we think that has been allowing us to be sucked into false beliefs and religious cults. The enemy destroys us through these mass movements. If we turn inward for inspired guidance we will avoid being yoked by outer forces in the world. This is something a significant number of people most certainly can do.
In fact, growing numbers of seekers are turning away from fundamentalist religions and towards the pursuit of a more intimate, authentic spiritual connection. However, at the same time, religious fundamentalism is growing ever more militant and political. If this fundamentalist progression cannot be arrested, the world will again be plunged into desolation.
“Your approach to how humanity can avoid this takeover, is that each and every human has to stop doing human things and start deep meditation to find the holy spirit, the heart, the soul of self and mentally ward off these entities... this ain’t going to happen. Eight billion people are not going to do this."
"You are in complete opposition to Dr. Steven Greer who thinks these entities are loving peaceful entities bent on moving humanity forward.”
I am definitely opposed to the works of Dr. Greer who, as you know, touts a close relationship with the "aliens." He has gone so far as to claim that there are no abductions by anyone other than “the military.” However, he does not offer which alleged military has such reach as to be able to abduct people all around the world with impunity. Read more on my take on Dr. Greer's endeavors in this article.
If a critical number of us are deceived and accept being programmed to trust in benevolent aliens, the result will be another fall of our advancing civilization. Dr. Greer is trying hard to increase his cult following, promulgating this dangerous trust. Please think about this: If stealing and genetically mutilating our unborn is their definition of “moving humanity forward,” that alone should reveal their true incilnations.
Unfortunately, alien cult-think is fast becoming a new form of fundamentalism. We must be mindful that what the abductors do to the individual, they are willing to do to us all.
I have anticipated that a lot of people will have difficulty with this subject matter as it challenges us to get out of our comfort zone and see the ugliness right in front of us. The ones who will have the greatest difficulty with it are the abductees themselves who are already struggling with unconscious trauma. Unfortunately, they are the ones who need this information the most.